Skip to main content

Robots Will Never Take Our Jobs...Right?

In recent months, I have noticed an unprecedented wave of fast food strikes across the nation, including ChicagoSt. LouisDetroitMilwaukee, and Seattle.  In each of these cases, the workers have demanded a raise to $15 an hour.  Fine.  People are free to want more money.  Obviously, they have their reasons since 84% of NYC fast food workers report "wage theft."  However, this is not a question of desires, but of economics. Before striking, any wise laborer would be aware how much the employer would need to spend to replace the workers.  If the strikers are unwilling to work for less than what it would cost to replace them, they will quickly find themselves out of a job.

As these strikes persist, I'm concerned that businesses will find it more profitable to automate blue collar workplace processes than it would be to employ hirer-minimum-wage workers.  (E.g. Amazon is investing billions of its yearly revenue back into streamlining the management of its global supply chain.  In fact, Amazon recently acquired its first robotics company.  Perhaps, in the near future, warehouse robots will automate Amazon's delivery process so it can be operate for a fraction of what it costs to run now.)  If automation become ubiquitous, what will happen to all the blue collar workers?  I've read what a few brilliant economists have said on the topic and the general concensus is that as new technologies are developed (which destroy jobs), and equal number of jobs will be created to support the new technologies.

But still, I worry—what if McDonalds were to suddenly automate their cashiers or grill cooks?  How would that financially impact the workforce in the economic lower-class?  The adoption of new technologies creates both white-collar and blue-collar jobs.  But what if the transition happens too fast for blue-collar workers to adapt?  A transition like that would require training and education (and motivation).  What if the majority of ex-burger-flipping Americans prefer to sit defiantly on their rears waiting for the inevitable federal welfare handout rather than making the necessary sacrifices to educate themselves and qualify for the new jobs.  Now. I know this will never happen.  But it still scares me.

If only we lived in post-scarcity society with unlimited energy, food replicators, and holodecks, like in Star Trek, which I'm confident that we will achieve one day (e.g. The Zeitgiest Movement).  The real question is, how do we manage the suffering inevitably to occur between now and then?  Here are some fun thoughts from Star Trek's reality, found on Quora.

Read How can the world function without money in Star Trek? on Quora

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Rummi-"CUB" vs. Rummi-"CUBE"

The "Rummikub" Pronunciation Debate Affirmative Constructive: "Cub" For years, I have been a firm advocate and defender of the pronunciation, Rummi-"CUB".  The game box I grew up with spelled it, Rummicub  on the box. However, other productions of the game have variant spellings: Rummykub , Rummy Kube , Rummy Tiles , etc.  Based solely on box spelling, the game's true pronunciation is open to interpretation. Therefore, Rummi"cub" is equally acceptable to any other given pronunciation. Negative  Constructive : "Cube" My opponents argue that since the game originated over seas, we ought to respect and maintain its original pronunciation. Affirmative Rebuttal: Americanization of the Term When the game was brought to America and given Americanized rules, its name was also Americanized. Pronunciation loyalists then counter my rebuttal with, "there are lots of adopted foreign words that have retained their original pron...

The Secret Reason Why "Good Witch" Feels Emotionally Off

TL;DR It's the Botox. For the past 3 months, my wife, Stacia, and I have been watching  Good Witch  (via Netflix and Amazon Prime). Stacia adores winding down to "Hallmark-y shows." We can rely on Good Witch episodes to always resolve happily. The episodes are never too intense. The height of conflict revolves around things like someone's inability to locate the perfect spot to snap a romantic photo for a new tourism brochure. I consider my time watching these shows spouse bonding time , and emotional training. My favorite thing about watching feel-good shows with Stacia is getting to observe her facial reactions to the on-screen drama. When two people lean in for a long-anticipated kiss, Stacia tucks her knees into her chest and frowns with her forehead while lifting her chin and bottom lip. While I'm typically unable to suspend my disbelief, Stacia seems completely entranced by the various characters' emotions. Wishing I could join her in being swept aw...

Who's Got The Funk?

I am an amateur guitarist, and I've got no funk. My musical skills seem to lacking that special something . Great musicians have it . Those fortunate enough to have gotten hold of  it , create timeless hits. While musicians without it  fade into oblivion. After spending hours searching through Blues history websites and 1970's band documentaries online, I discovered what that special something  is thank to a (70% Man, 30% fish) character from the BBC show "The Mighty Boosh" named Old Gregg. He identified that  thing  as  The Funk ! But what exactly is The Funk ? Here is some dialogue from the show to help explain its origin and purpose: Old Gregg: You're a musician, yeah? Howard: Yes I am. Old Gregg: Butchya ain't very good, are ya? Howard: I'm one of the best in town. Old Gregg: Come on, I read your reviews. Hmm? You know what your problem is? Howard: What? Old Gregg: Ya ain't got the funk. You're all rigid. Hmm? You're l...